Better get on it!
Minor weather delay in Chiberia and now I kinda made a commitment, to YOU
Better get on it!
Yeah, what he said!
I doubt it makes sense but I'd love for Fred to offer a UM tune that is for stock fueling (or stock + LPFP) without the MPI active. It's a bigger chunk of change to do MPI and the turbo all at once, even though it's worth it in the long run.
Minor weather delay in Chiberia and now I kinda made a commitment, to YOU
Possible but it would need to support a HPFP as it seems most cars need it without MPI. I don't think UM is too keen on the upgraded HPFP's, so I doubt it'll happen.
-- Ed
10's are coming as soon as the weather cooperates out here! This car is making about 100whp less than mine
-- Ed
I already asked about the HPFP and that is definitely not something they were touching, sadly.
Wasn't the OPs car in this thread tuned on that fueling hardware first? Or was the HPFP on from the beginning and an LPFP added later for the E30 dyno. I can't keep track anymore!
10s on your car or customers? If customer, that would be a tall order on 91 crapola.
I did a quick 60-130 run today in my Golf R. This is full weight plus standard junk including a kit seat. I only did one run, so I’m sure it can be improved on. All things considered, happy to see under 9s. This is with our Vortex turbo on E30 (downpipe, intake, intercooler, HPFP, LPFP, stock exhaust).
Man Ed, you must be very close to Mexico!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I stopped by the EQT shop yesterday looking to meet Ed, get a ride in the shop car and order up some work for my MK7R. Unfortunately he wasn't there and the Turbos are back-ordered. Back to lurking I go..
Kelvin
I’m so curious for UM EQT results
same here.. but with fbo everything and 450LPFP, port injection and E85 (not sure what mix ratio) i think it will be on a stock block around 420 lbs/ft capped at wheels. (for longevity/reliability) and close to 500whp. not too shabby. the torque curve when we see it, will tell alot.