Agreed. He should run for office.Troy needs to become a representative....now could he find people that agree with his views on this topic....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agreed. He should run for office.Troy needs to become a representative....now could he find people that agree with his views on this topic....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just throw up speed cameras and be done with it. All the extra revenue and could get away with a reduction in staffing.
The whole discretion issue is how you end up with the big racial divide on marijuana arrests
Just throw up speed cameras and be done with it. All the extra revenue and could get away with a reduction in staffing.
The whole discretion issue is how you end up with the big racial divide on marijuana arrests
Fuck speed cameras.
No doubt. But if there was absolute enforcement like with a camera, you can bet people would be protesting/lobbying/mobbing to have the limits raised.
No doubt. But if there was absolute enforcement like with a camera, you can bet people would be protesting/lobbying/mobbing to have the limits raised.
Just throw up speed cameras and be done with it. All the extra revenue and could get away with a reduction in staffing.
The whole discretion issue is how you end up with the big racial divide on marijuana arrests
I think it's both. Look at NY's fantastic stop and frisk programs.There is no discretion on felony arrests. If there is a useable and testable quantity of any drubg, state law and policy dictate that an arrest will be made. Do you have any proof of this discretion causing a racial divide with drug arrests, or is it the fact that more minorities then white people live in impoverished areas where drug use is more common?
I think it's both. Look at NY's fantastic stop and frisk programs.
/s
Very interesting statistics.I did. Have you seen percentage of stop and frisk demographics compared to crime statistic demographics?
Here is some info. It's a bit old (2012) but it's still relevant.
http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/downlo...planning/2012_year_end_enforcement_report.pdf
Very interesting statistics.
I agree. I'm not a very big fan of stop and frisks myself, but it is definitely not a racially biased practice. The percentage of stop and frisks by race is about equal to the percentage of the crime committed by that race in NY. It is a waste of time. They did something like 600,000 stop and frisks and only retrieved 176 firearms. That's a good number of guns, but for those 600,000 stop and frisks that were conducted, if they did surveillance on high crime area with all that man power, I think more of an impact could be made. Maybe not. I don't care I don't live in NY lol I just don't understand the legal justification behind a stop such as that. In AZ we have to believe that a crime is afoot, we can't just go pat down people willy nilly. Unless it's consensual, and a lot of times, criminals that are packing heat/drugs are stupid enough to let us do it.