I've been enjoying my car for just over 3 weeks and 2000km now. Running Shell V-Power 98+ exclusively, and never pushing it until the oil temp is up, and then only for short blasts. Noticing interesting differences in throttle response between Normal, Eco, and Sport modes. Nothing to make me believe it is out of the ordinary, just new to me.
For comparison I'm coming off a heavier, less powerful naturally aspirated car, and I also have frequent access to a lighter, considerably more powerful car (Passat B5 sedan, Turbo 1.8 FWD 5-spd with at least a stage 2 tune). When my car is lightly loaded, the on-boost power is completely satisfactory for the expectations that I had based on the power-to-weight ratio and torque curve information. It also seems to handle its 150+ horsepower in an exemplarily controlled manner, without the levels of torque steer exhibited by the older Passat that I have experience with. Of course, that Passat has more power, more turbo lag, and wheel spacers which likely have a negative effect on steering geometry, so there are several reasons for my newer, stock Golf to behave in a more civilized fashion.
If I were to improve one thing about the way the engine works, I would want it to have more immediate response to throttle inputs. It is nothing like the ketchup effect turbo lag made famous by early turbocharged cars, and I'm not expecting a 1.4l engine to have the low-end torque of a Chevy LS, but there is a slight delay between the push of the foot and the subsequent response.
I suspect that the upcoming Evo version of the EA211 has been designed to increase off-boost power and minimize that delay, as it has a slightly higher displacement (1.5 instead of 1.4l), a higher compression ratio, and a variable-vane turbo, which should spool up in a more responsive fashion. Peak power and torque ratings have not gone up, but they are making a point of how it hits maximum torque lower in the RPM range, and has 10% better efficiency when measured in real-world application.