clutch fool
OG MUFF DIVER
- Location
- Roc NY
- Car(s)
- MK5 GTI 1st Owner
thanks for the info bubba. i think i will end up getting the 50mm 1.8 because its only $100 but i was hoping to find a nice 50mm that can be used for Maco that has a 1:1 ratio.
85mm is much more telephoto than a 50. Both are f/1.8 primes, and so will be pretty darn bright and pretty darn sharp. The 50mm is just far far wider angle.
Clutch, IMHO wide is where it's at. Unfortunately I do not think wide macros are all that useful because you will have to get VERY close to your subject. I've wanted to dabble at shooting insects and flowers as macros. The argument I hear is that 100mm is actually too wide for that as you still have to get too close. Most I talk to suggest something in the 150-180mm range if you want to do that stuff right. The Canon offering, the EF 180mm f/3.5L is priced at like $1300 though.
In that light the 100/2.8 starts looking REALLY good. The 100 is effing-A sharp too. Most say it is as good as any L.
Me, I'd get the nifty 50/1.8 and save for a 100/2.8 to play with macro. But then I don't actually own the 50. I spent more and got the 35/2.0. ... As said, I really like wide angle photography.
wow such a beaut, what type of dog is that?
nhbubba.....thanks for the info.
Looks like a Weimeraner
nhbubba.....thanks for the info.