Is it safe to say that just the BL plate and the iAbed pan are enough without the catch can system or do you still think that is necessary? It seems like any of the main track-oriented CCs out there like Racingline/Spulen handle the issue of oil surge and starvation but still get plenty of oil kicked into the CC whereas your setup seems to handle it all without the oil loss which is ideal.
Seems like more of this could be attributed to the iAbed oil pan baffling and design so that would be the main fix and then the BL plate is just a solid upgrade to OEM.
My car has the United Motorsport files for ECU, DSG, Haldex; along with the AWE catted-resonated downpipe.
Stock IS38 turbo. So, pretty much a 'stage 2' type setup.
I started with the BL plate and ECS catch can. Added the iABED pan later on.
When I added the iABED pan, the catch can fluid amount dropped from about 3 tablespoons to maybe 1 tablespoon.
This, after 4 track sessions at HPR.
With both setups, zero fluid in catch can for any street driving.
Prior to this car, I had a '16 GTI with stage 2 APR setup; and experienced the same kind of thing you are reporting.
At that time, the VWR Racingline kit (plate and cc) was what I used to stop the smoke issue.
However, the can would get full enough that I had to drain it after 3 sessions; and eventually add some engine oil.
With the BL plate, no smoke and much less fluid into the can.
I think the BL/iABED combo is a good bang for buck.
I have a thing about always having a catch can, because it helps tell me how effective the PCV / Oil pan setup is working.
I read about guys with big turbo setups reporting that the BL plate doesn't solve the problem.
(Although Dan at DBV2 reports no issues with his hybrid turbo setup. There's a thread on this forum about it).
Maybe for them, or for anyone, the new APR PCV / Can setup will be effective; hoping to see reports on this soon.