, however... he may not be doing it anymore since business has picked up. When you click on all of the options it says "Sold Out". He still has AP's available... may not be handing out the included E-Tunes to us anymore.Haha his ambient was 79F during the pulls... so you can imagine what 90F ambient will do when it starts to warm up. Yeah, if he was running 91... dang.
He's had that special for a while
But I definitely agree. It's great to see the AP gaining support.
And Hexxum, I don't want it to seem like we're bashing your results! Your log looks AMAZING! I hope our feedback has been helpful. The limiting factor to our platform is not the engine, nor is it really fueling (for is20 application). It's the turbo. So we can continue to push the turbo to its limits... but eventually, it will fail. You're running high boost. It's brought incredible results, but I'm personally worried about checking the forums one day and seeing that you blew your turbo
It highlights one of the great reasons for doing an is38 swap. We can get more airflow with less turbine RPM and get power gains. Better reliability, more power.
Not yet. My tuner did the 91 octane tune on the dyno first and then he threw in some E85 to do the E30 tune. So when he took it off of the dyno it was on the E30 tune. He told me to do a few rips around the area to see how I liked it, that's when I did that quick log. When I switch to the 91 octane tune, I'll run another log.
Here is my dyno sheet. My tune was done on a Mustang dyno so keep in mind that Mustang dyno numbers are approximately 15% lower than what you would see on a dynojet. The sold line (run #1) is my E30 tune and the dotted line (run #2) is the 91 octane tune. Jon also posted my dyno sheet on the 5150 Racing Facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/5150.Racing.Dyno/
You are a legend! Thanks for this info. Your numbers look on point for a mustang. My car did 288whp/368wtq on a mustang after my 93oct protune.And since this is a comparison thread, here is an interesting comparison of the dyno runs on my car between my 5150 Racing 91 octane tune (red lines, run #1), the Cobb stage 3 OTS tune (black lines, run #2) and the MAP stage 1 91 octane tune (blue line, run #3). Once again, this is on a Mustang dyno so you have to add about 15% to get approximate dynojet numbers.
No problem man. I'm happy to return the favor. You are one of the people that helped me decide to go with a Cobb AP in the first place. Yup, looks like the numbers work out almost perfectly between 91 and 93 octane. I was told about 15 hp difference and our numbers are about 14hp apart. That's why I also wanted an E30 tune. My E30 tune is a beast! haha My poor stock clutch isn't going to last much longer. lol