which type of catch can relieves crankcase pressure better- the inline (BFI type) or ones that replace with new plate?
I don't know all the plate designs, but the ones I've seen don't include a valve at all. This would mean it's open all the time, doing gas/liquid separation. This also means you're relying on the can and plate to form a closed system when on throttle. When off throttle and the crank case is under pressure I assume some part of the valve less system has to vent via a gasket, port, or something. You have to vent, but I'm not sure how each of those systems accomplish it specifically.
The goal of pcv is to open the valve when crank pressure exceeds manifold pressure and dump the unburned "blow-by" gas from the crank case into the manifold where the gasses have a second shot to burn. It also closes the valve when you're generating power and the manifold pressure is greater than the crank case pressure.
The problem with this design on track is that under heavy braking the return feed from the pcv to the oil pan gets oil pushed into it from the heavy braking gforce while off throttle. Off throttle means the valve is open since the crank pressure exceeds manifold pressure and the oil from the pan can freely travel up the return to gas/liquid separator diaphragm in the pcv. Once there, and you put your foot back on it, the oil is sucked into the intake and into the combustion chambers. Hello smokescreen!!
The catch can is simply a gas/liquid separator with more storage for when the built in return/valve system fails. Replacing the pcv plate opens the system so the can does all of the separation and return (if it does a return at all), as well as sealing when manifold pressure is higher. This is why those designs catch more fluids all the time (if they're not returning the gasses).