TPC20 Gti Vs turbo camaro, GT500 & more

[jimlloyd40]

ya. 11.5 @127 stock. slow car. it’s a 130mph car with a couple of bolt ons and cuts through the air a shit tonne better than our boxy cars but ya, your bias is clear.
i’m anxiously waiting for you to post up your vid of you beating a car of this caliber. .
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.mot...orvette/2006/2006-chevrolet-corvette-z06/amp/

You know that you just quoted yourself right? And @JerseyDrew77 won't have any trouble beating that time when he gets his engine installed.
He'll have more HP than the Vette and I'm guessing mid to low 10 second quarters.

 

[Mk7Matt]

Damn son ...that’s impressive! Great build!

 

[THEREALVRT]

You know that you just quoted yourself right? And @JerseyDrew77 won't have any trouble beating that time when he gets his engine installed.
He'll have more HP than the Vette and I'm guessing mid to low 10 second quarters.

lol. too much sauce.
and if ifs and buts were candies and nuts we’d all have a merry xmas.

 

[jimlloyd40]

lol. too much sauce.
and if ifs and buts were candies and nuts we’d all have a merry xmas.

Well EQT 's R does 10.47 in the quarter and they don't have MPI or Ethanol. So he'll get there easily. Traction will be his problem.

 

[Acadia18]

ya. 11.5 @127 stock. slow car. it’s a 130mph car with a couple of bolt ons and cuts through the air a shit tonne better than our boxy cars but ya, your bias is clear.
i’m anxiously waiting for you to post up your vid of you beating a car of this caliber. .
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.mot...orvette/2006/2006-chevrolet-corvette-z06/amp/

I think the point Drew is making is that Car A does 1/4 in 11.5. Car B is claiming to do 1/4 in high 10's. Therefore, Car B should be faster than Car A and win in a race. But the posted video shows the opposite.

 

[THEREALVRT]

I think the point Drew is making is that Car A does 1/4 in 11.5. Car B is claiming to do 1/4 in high 10's. Therefore, Car B should be faster than Car A and win in a race. But the posted video shows the opposite.

he never claimed to do 10s. he said it’s possible and he’s going to try for it. i said the turbo is capable of making enough power to get into the 10s. also the car he raced is not stock. exhaust and intake would give that car the ability to trap close to 130mph. thats a quick highway car.
127mph trap is a quick car, vettes get shit 1/4 because they are independent rear suspension. put a tire on a z06 and its a 10 sec car on stock power.

 

[THEREALVRT]

Well EQT 's R does 10.47 in the quarter and they don't have MPI or Ethanol. So he'll get there easily. Traction will be his problem.

that car had mpi and E. watch the video of that R, its also got aggressive tires and looks like it has no exhaust

 

[El_bigote_AJ]

Well EQT 's R does 10.47 in the quarter and they don't have MPI or Ethanol. So he'll get there easily. Traction will be his problem.

What? Lol.

Ed’s car was mpi and probably race gas e85, not even just pump85


Also the problem that most and failing to see cause they are so concerned with trying to prove kyles car isn’t fast and a tpc20 sucks, lol - you fail to see using the argument of the zo6 vid for proving the cars not really able to do a 60-130 in whatever suggested time based on what a c6 zo6 can do in a quarter mile is not a valid argument in this scenario...

Go back and watch the video - they start at 60 and it’s not till 140+ the zo6 even catch’s up.

So using that as a reasoning of his 60-130 is fake is not valid, nor is saying that Xxx car can’t do xxx in a 1/4 because you watched a vid of the car (hatchback) lose after going 140mph (to a sleek sports car rated to almost 200mph)
Because you’re not hitting 140 traps till you’re in the 9sec territory.

*btw -Im not siding with either side of coin for the 60-130 being fake or real, I’m just stating using the vette for reference don’t work.


Side note: if anyone’s paying attention to the vids when he shifts from 3-4th you can see and hear how little him not being an AUTOMATIC would actually affect his 60-130... he’s really banging that shift quickly, and has previously bent/opened forks to prove it, lol

 

[Escape Hatch]

Cliff notes:

1. I'm going to bitch about Facebook posts on this forum to clear up confussion.

2. More confusion created due to someone claiming dislexia and English being a second language. Appologies and OP moves on.

3. My TPC20 makes the same power as larger turbos and is faster than all you bitches in 60-130 by over a second.

4. My turbo is capable of 10s in a GTI.

5. My pee pee is bigger than yours.

Sounds about right?

 

[jimlloyd40]

that car had mpi and E. watch the video of that R, its also got aggressive tires and looks like it has no exhaust

If you read the text EQT said that their car was running E85 on stock internals and stock catback exhaust. There's no mention of MPI.

 

[JerseyDrew77]

Cliff notes:

1. I'm going to bitch about Facebook posts on this forum to clear up confussion.

2. More confusion created due to someone claiming dislexia and English being a second language. Appologies and OP moves on.

3. My TPC20 makes the same power as larger turbos and is faster than all you bitches in 60-130 by over a second.

4. My turbo is capable of 10s in a GTI.

5. My pee pee is bigger than yours.

Sounds about right?

Lol... Exactly. I find it comical how some are trying to find anything and everything to try and prove that this TPC20 will and can do 10's in the 1/4 mile.

Well EQT 's R does 10.47 in the quarter and they don't have MPI or Ethanol. So he'll get there easily. Traction will be his problem.

I'm not sure exactly if Ed had MPI with full E85 when he did that run but do know he never built his block.

For me, traction will not be a problem when using full race slicks.

 

[El_bigote_AJ]

Cliff notes:

1. I'm going to bitch about Facebook posts on this forum to clear up confussion.

2. More confusion created due to someone claiming dislexia and English being a second language. Appologies and OP moves on.

3. My TPC20 makes the same power as larger turbos and is faster than all you bitches in 60-130 by over a second.

4. My turbo is capable of 10s in a GTI.

5. My pee pee is bigger than yours.

Sounds about right?

Wrong thread.

 

[El_bigote_AJ]

If you read the text EQT said that their car was running E85 on stock internals and stock catback exhaust. There's no mention of MPI.

Haha, do you really need your hard held and specifically told the car was running mpi?

I’d think you frequent the forum enough and have your car modded enough to understand it.


1. You cannot run full e85 on a max effort vortex xl with DI only. Even if there was an option to get DI injectors that flowed more you still couldn’t do it and the window of when you squirt fuel into the combustion chamber shrinks as the RPMs increase.

2.a built motor (stronger bottom end internals) on a engine that’s already been designed with boost specific compression in stock form , (so same or close compression and not increasing the displacement will not give you an engine that’s making more power... it’s just making it meant to handle the power. )

Also the catback was not connect to the DP when that car ran those times... and you’ve been told this many time from many members when your made that inaccurate claim.

 

[jimlloyd40]

Haha, do you really need your hard held and specifically told the car was running mpi?

I’d think you frequent the forum enough and have your car modded enough to understand it.


1. You cannot run full e85 on a max effort vortex xl with DI only. Even if there was an option to get DI injectors that flowed more you still couldn’t do it and the window of when you squirt fuel into the combustion chamber shrinks as the RPMs increase.

2.a built motor (stronger bottom end internals) on a engine that’s already been designed with boost specific compression in stock form , (so same or close compression and not increasing the displacement will not give you an engine that’s making more power... it’s just making it meant to handle the power. )

Also the catback was not connect to the DP when that car ran those times... and you’ve been told this many time from many members when your made that inaccurate claim.

I quoted what is on the EQT website.

 

[El_bigote_AJ]

Lol... Exactly. I find it comical how some are trying to find anything and everything to try and prove that this TPC20 will and can do 10's in the 1/4 mile.

In my case that’s not accurate at all...

I don’t have a dog in the fight, I personally don’t think the tcp20 or 38
a better choice than a comparable vortex standard or Xl, due to brand representation and products proven track records since the vortex has sooo many more cumulative driven miles.

I’m stating above your logic based on the video is not sound.


Also to be noted - it’s not far fetched to think a hybrid Is20 can run a high ten.. standard vortex has run 10.6s on more than on car, and that’s “based on” a is20 housing.