GOLFMK8
GOLFMK7
GOLFMK6
GOLFMKV

The COVID19 SCAMdemic... WW3 Is 2 Days Away - Another Distraction From This Administration's Epic Fails

M

MagicMK

Drag Racing Champion
Location
PA
Strange Mud said:
9Kin CT...i do have some property and a nice house though. Small town volunteer FD, No trash p/up, nice school system. My house is undervalued.

Magic,

your facts are not going to change most peoples mind. just have fun with this thread.

Mud
Click to expand...
I'm not even necessarily trying to change minds. I don't think Zrick and others are going to change their mind. At this point, I'm simply trying to identify what "facts" everyone is relying upon. I've noticed medRxIV links show up a bunch of times, so I became suspicious. MedRxIV articles simply are not credible since almost anyone can post an article on medRxIV. You can't do the same with peer reviewed white papers. At this point, I'm just asking if any of the any of the anti-vaxxers in this thread can cite a credible source for some of their claims.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WAP
M

MagicMK

Drag Racing Champion
Location
PA
Unreal1 said:
Already been through this before. The only difference between mRNA spike and wild is that mRNA version does not fuse cells. Other than that, they are identical. Thus, their behavior will be identical as well, minus that missing attribute. You cannot create a spike that's genetically identical and have it operate in an entirely different manner.

The spike is deemed to be safe on the sole basis that it remains localized to the injection site. If it remains localized, it is absolutely safe. If it circulates through the body, it is no different other than not being able to fuse cells. That said, there are already studies showing that the mRNA spike can and has circulated.
Click to expand...
Okay, so that we don't end up on the rhetorical hamster wheel - please show your work. Where are you getting this information? Is any of it published/peer reviewed? Cite me a credible article (not from that some jackass in college uploading to MedRxIV).... show me some published article that has some level of peer review that was based upon actual *research* that corroborates what you've just stated, above. Also, YouTube video or the Joe Rogan podcast are NOT considered credible sources.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WAP
M

MagicMK

Drag Racing Champion
Location
PA
cb1111 said:
The statement that an article is most likely accurate before it has been peer reviewed yet is absurd.

zricky can post an article that he, anotero and unreal know everything there is to know about COVID. Once peer reviewed (by everyone here who has a functioning brain cell) that article will be proven to be bullshit - ergo, the article was wrong.
Click to expand...
Well... yes, exactly.

*Zrick furiously typing in background
 
M

MagicMK

Drag Racing Champion
Location
PA
BadHombre760 said:
you're missing the point. they're not "giving" it to poor people, they're forcing them to take it via threat of them losing their job when they're already struggling to make ends meet
Click to expand...
Wait, I thought conservatives believed poor people don't work and live off of Welfare and Biden stimulus checks? Poor people actually WANT to work!?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WAP
U

Unreal1

Autocross Champion
Location
Pittsburgh
MagicMK said:
I'm not even necessarily trying to change minds. I don't think Zrick and others are going to change their mind. At this point, I'm simply trying to identify what "facts" everyone is relying upon. I've noticed medRxIV links show up a bunch of times, so I became suspicious. MedRxIV articles simply are not credible since almost anyone can post an article on medRxIV. You can't do the same with peer reviewed white papers. At this point, I'm just asking if any of the any of the anti-vaxxers in this thread can cite a credible source for some of their claims.
Click to expand...

I'm not aware of anyone here being anti-vax.

You do realize most studies start as pre-print and not peer reviewed? It's part of the process. medrxiv.org was founded by Yale. It's not some random website. The source of the studies I've linked to are from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and various other credible hospitals and scientists.
 
U

Unreal1

Autocross Champion
Location
Pittsburgh
MagicMK said:
Okay, so that we don't end up on the rhetorical hamster wheel - please show your work. Where are you getting this information? Is any of it published/peer reviewed? Cite me a credible article (not from that some jackass in college uploading to MedRxIV).... show me some published article that has some level of peer review that was based upon actual *research* that corroborates what you've just stated, above. Also, YouTube video or the Joe Rogan podcast are NOT considered credible sources.
Click to expand...

Can some "jackass" upload to nature.com? For some reason you ignored all of those sources.
 
M

MagicMK

Drag Racing Champion
Location
PA
Unreal1 said:
I'm not aware of anyone here being anti-vax.

You do realize most studies start as pre-print and not peer reviewed? It's part of the process. medrxiv.org was founded by Yale. It's not some random website. The source of the studies I've linked to are from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and various other credible hospitals and scientists.
Click to expand...
You do realize most term papers start with just one word and then a bunch more words are added? I mean, yeah, that's why articles are peer reviewed (in the first place) before they are considered credible... any jackass can claim anything they want by simply writing it down. If I'm a doctor, I don't want to be reading non-peer reviewed articles about how masturbation lowers cholesterol levels. That claim would actually need to be peer reviewed before the doctor started telling his patients with high cholesterol to start... watching more PornHub? There's a million YouTubers out there that are total idiots... but just happen to be entertaining. We don't want those same morons adding "scientific articles" simply because they know how to write an article and upload it to a website... do we?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WAP
M

MagicMK

Drag Racing Champion
Location
PA
Unreal1 said:
Can some "jackass" upload to nature.com? For some reason you ignored all of those sources.
Click to expand...
Lol, I did not ignore anything... I mean, I just randomly picked MedRxIV and focused on it. That was the only one I looked at. Okay, if you think Nature.com has a credible article re why mRNA COVID vaccines are dangerous, then provide me a link of this article, and I'll look at that one as well. Show me what ya got...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top