Ed and I both agree that if timing is pulled the engine loses power. Ed also understands that if the WOT base map is not close enough for the E20-30 blend then the short term fuel trims are unable to adjust the AFR appropriately and it will be lean causing detonation. He actually knows what the deal is unlike the keyboard WizDUMB professed by the technically challenged.
You don't know what you don't know. In this instance, you are talking theory and absolutes based on archaic ecu technology. Guess what, we are now at the point where advanced closed loop systems have built in fuel regulation systems on the fly. The fact you had to insult me just further shows your ignorance.
Point 1, it will go lean.
It will be over target lambda when you start the car and drive off the first time, yes. Then long term trims will add the 5-10% extra fuel and the closed loop target figures are dead on. No one with half a brain targets stoichiometry at wot, so there is no fear of lean induced knock. That is bad tuning and/or old ecu technology with open loop design or poor fueling trim memory.
Point 2, the actual maps used by the main companies won't allow e30 because they are on the ragged edge.
No, they all target stoichiometry until 800-1000mg/STK of flow at which point they target around .85-.78 at full boost. No ots is20 file taxes the fuel system except the giac race file maybe. This is from tuning almost 100 cars on this platform and looking at over 5000 logs, doing 20+ dyno tunes, owning 5 turbos on my two personal mqb vehicles and logging/testing for the past 4 years. I mean what is empirical evidence worth? Nothing I guess. Theory trumps reality, right?
I'll have the thread cleaned up, don't worry about it. There's always that guy that can't admit he's wrong. He fills his part.
I will update the list tomorrow