This topic is well beyond my level of expertise, however I’ll link the below in case anyone is interested
Quoting from user, dv52 over in the ODB11 forums,
“hmmm.......... you are not the first to have discovered this method but I would suggest that the short term gain (being the removal of SS) does indeed come with a long term cost.
For your method to work without affecting any other facility in the car, the Battery monitor control module (it's called J367)would need to do nothing else but SS. This is not the case!
J367 is involved in measuring the battery condition for a host of other purposes including providing data to the car for the calculation for the alternator charging profile - which changes with age, usage and condition. The car stores the complete battery history - meaning that it monitors every ampere that either leaves the battery, or is injected into the battery (i.e. by the alternator, or by the recuperation system). This data is used over the life cycle for the battery to optimize its longevity. It's J367 that is does much of the data provision for this data and disconnecting the module WILL impact battery life-alas.
I hate SS with a vengeance; I think it's the most dangerous facility in a car and I want it removed from any car that I drive - but I wouldn't suggest that J367 is removed because of the long term consequences. Install a automated switch instead
Don”
Page two, about halfway down,
https://forum.obdeleven.com/thread/6296/start-stop-system-deactivation?page=2