I'll give the Neuspeed one thing.. because the air moved slow.. it cooled a lot faster than my oem or even my treadstone does. like the temp shot down very fast, almost too fast to read. but once my tuner looked at my logs and said something is very restricted in front... and i had changed to that intercooler, it made sense. then, mygolf dude did a test a couple weeks later and confirmed the exact same thing regarding flow. That's when i sold it.
I still think about just going back to a stock intercooler sometimes... this stuff is just too much to take in and analyze. wonder if i should have just stayed with the Neuspeed IS38 IC to begin with... I bought that godamn thing TWICE....
i just cant get over how it flows only a bit more than HALF what the stock crappy IC flows..
View attachment 163864
I need to keep my Treadsone anyway.. mainly because I use its hose couplers to mount my fog lights..
The air moving through the Neuspeed FMIC would not be slow versus the OEM and Treadstone. Compared to those two the Neuspeed seems to have less area for air to pass through, based on the core dimensions and number of charge air rows, which would result in a higher velocity through the core. Just as drag on your car increases with the speed that the car passes through the air so does the internal drag of the core increase with increasing air velocity.
It's not likely that the rate of change of IAT reading occurred as a result of the core, I've logged the temperature leaving the core and it is significantly less than what the IAT sensor reports.