GOLFMK8
GOLFMK7
GOLFMK6
GOLFMKV

Continental vs. Bosch direct injectors

scrllock

Autocross Champion
Location
MI
I've got a 2019 Golf R, which is the year VW decided to switch suppliers for direct injectors on their NA 2.0T motors from Bosch to Continental. There have been widespread complaints about premature injector failures, and talking to several shops who rebuild these, they all favor Bosch when possible.

Personally I had at least 2 sets of continentals (06K906036N on the R/S3/TTS) fail. I believe this is a combination of higher crankcase pressure (common with larger turbos and ethanol) and poor tuning. Fuel flow keeps the injectors cool and it's not uncommon to add MPI to a car and have the DI fail shortly thereafter, as some tuners rely heavily on the port injectors, pulling fuel out of the DI system. I also sent my first set out for spray pattern testing and they found that even after cleaning, the pattern was all over the place compared to Bosch. Build quality just seems terrible all around.

1732028382601.png


Some tuners (EQT) offer a paid service to change your calibration to use the Bosch injectors (GTI or R) as a solution. When my first motor failed, I opted to fit the Bosch R injectors (06L906036AK) via FCPEuro.
This also ended up being a mistake, as the shop that did this did not know to use the proper spacer (which only comes in rebuild kits, not with new injectors):

1732028254967.png


1732028290785.png


11 thousand miles later, my second motor developed a bad misfire, and upon inspection, I found scored cylinder walls and decided to tear the motor down for a rebuild. Upon inspection, the only other issue I found was that the Bosch injectors were installed without that spacer, and that they were now sitting 1-2mm deeper into the head than intended. I don't know if it was poor combustion due to a change in spray angle, poor spray pattern from the clogged/burnt injector or what. But there was a ton of carbon on the piston crowns, the head, the injectors, and somehow debris had gotten into the ringlands, causing scoring up past where the rings themselves travel.

1732028619881.png


(this is a clean bosch injector installed with no spacer)

And this is how a continental looks, or a bosch with a spacer:

1732028683488.png


I believe that that difference is what caused my second motor to have issues. I sent these injectors out to get cleaned, tested and rebuilt and they said it was one of the most carbonized injector tips they've seen.

This is one of my original continental injectors with 25k on it, next to the much dirtier Bosch with 11k:

1732028801447.png



So, I figure I'd just make sure I install the spacer in the new motor, but after I started talking to guys who had done this retrofit, most of them aren't using the spacer. A couple who tried ended up with a leak at the o-ring on the rail somehow. Doesn't make any sense to me, as the spacer would just push the injector further into the rail. Me, I've got a new motor to break in, I'm not messing with fuel leaks so I bought new continental injectors and re-sealed them with a slightly taller (2.8mm vs. 2.7mm) teflon seal: https://injector-rehab.com/product/gdi-injector-2-8mm-teflon-combustion-seal/

Not ideal, since I still don't trust the continentals even with a proper MPI split. I'm also looking at this option to machine a second seal, which allegedly combats these issues: https://xtreme-di.com/product/double-seal/

I'm posting this because I'm sure there are other people who've dealt with this and I'm curious what fixed it for them. I know there are some people running the Bosch injectors without a spacer, and I would urge them to fix that ASAP. We've measured a couple DLRA/DKFA heads and found that the injector seat itself is machined differently. I'm tempted to find a CYFB head to have built and ported, just to make sure I can fit the Bosch injectors with no headaches. There are also at least two companies coming out with aftermarket EA888.3 direct injectors in the next year, and I've communicated with both of them about the need to test fit with a 2019+ head.
 

IGM2019

Passed Driver's Ed
Location
MA
Good info on fuel flow and failure with adding MPI, something I wasn't aware about. I do see when people post up about failures of them there's usually ethanol being used.

Just a data point my 19R 62k miles on the original injectors with no issues. Stock until 40k and then EQT stage 2 since. Will probably just replace them as preventative when doing carbon cleaning sometime within the next year.
 

scrllock

Autocross Champion
Location
MI
Good info on fuel flow and failure with adding MPI, something I wasn't aware about. I do see when people post up about failures of them there's usually ethanol being used.

Just a data point my 19R 62k miles on the original injectors with no issues. Stock until 40k and then EQT stage 2 since. Will probably just replace them as preventative when doing carbon cleaning sometime within the next year.


1732554313394.png


1732554344892.png


I alluded to this (and pasted this it in another thread) but I lent a set of the continentals to Nostrum (local direct injection-related engineering firm) and had them go through them. This is why, even with a more robust graphite seal, I don't especially trust them long-term. The conclusion they gave me was that my completely blown injector failed from heat, likely due to insufficient fuel flow. Poor combustion can result in detonation, which yeah, also real bad.

The other shop I talked to agreed on the general sentiment towards continental GDI, that they tend to need more frequent service and are less consistent between injectors.

1732555632640.png


If you look at the basic design of a GDI, it's a valve controlled by an electromagnet with a spring to hold it closed. Something about either the design, machining, or materials used in the continental part seems to be wearing faster.

Only other thought I have at the moment is that the 2019 cut-off is also when ROW cars ditched MPI for OPF, maybe the Bosch injectors were over-engineered to handle the heat from running in mode 8 (low torque MPI-only mode for soot control)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: krs

ChrisMk77

Autocross Champion
Location
Sweden
Car(s)
2018 GTI Performance
1732578421580.png

Would be nice to test MK8 Conti injectors, looks like they fit with provision for double seals but no clue how different they would work in our HPFP system.
 

scrllock

Autocross Champion
Location
MI
View attachment 313111
Would be nice to test MK8 Conti injectors, looks like they fit with provision for double seals but no clue how different they would work in our HPFP system.
You would probably need to retrofit the entire gen4 high pressure system, including the cylinder head (for the HPFP):

1732583263418.png


Our system can't produce 350+ bar. Interesting that they are double-sealed though. Incentive to maybe get mine done if an aftermarket option isn't available in the next few months.
 
Last edited:

Jachas

Go Kart Champion
Location
PL
Car(s)
A3 8V
Only other thought I have at the moment is that the 2019 cut-off is also when ROW cars ditched MPI for OPF, maybe the Bosch injectors were over-engineered to handle the heat from running in mode 8 (low torque MPI-only mode for soot control)?
Only PC3 engines was without MPI on ROW cars (well, at least EU cars that were "WLTP ready, witch was new emmision test procedure introduced in september 2018, so around MY19, engines codes starting with DNUx ) PC1 and PC2 still was using MPI on gen3b engines. Gen4 dropped MPI on all markets. New EA888Evo5 (debut in new A5 on PPC platform) seems to use only direct injection too
Our system can't produce 350+ bar. Interesting that they are double-sealed though. Incentive to maybe get mine done if an aftermarket option isn't available in the next few months.
Maybe pressure is higher, but if it fits, with different timing maps (as lower pressure means less fuel in same amount of time) they should work IMO
 
Last edited:

scrllock

Autocross Champion
Location
MI
Only PC3 engines was without MPI on ROW cars (well, at least EU cars that were "WLTP ready, witch was new emmision test procedure introduced in september 2018, so around MY19, engines codes starting with DNUx ) PC1 and PC2 still was using MPI on gen3b engines. Gen4 dropped MPI on all markets

Maybe pressure is higher, but if it fits, with different timing maps (as lower pressure means less fuel in same amount of time) they should work IMO
Yes, and I'm only comparing high-output parts. Gen3b/1.8 stuff isn't relevant.

Pressure is higher in part due to smaller bore diameter. I would not want to screw with testing the effects of a much longer injection window to accommodate. Late pooling can be an issue. Only obvious benefit is the double seal, which is a simple modification. Certainly suggests there's merit to that.
I would not suggest anyone try using them without a spare cylinder head to check fitment issues. I would not personally ever use them without the appropriate high pressure pump, DI is very precise and expensive to screw up with armchair engineering.
 
Top