This is the PUT and the MAP sensor actual readings. At WOT you'll see very minor differences. Everything looks ok here indicating no boost leak back in March, post intercooler readings.
https://datazap.me/u/msh/log-1647110450?log=0&data=8-15-38
Pre-intercooler is a bit more difficult as there is nothing you could log showing pressure at the turbo outlet. This is where looking at PUT setpoint vs PUT actual helps out. As you can see it is hitting the request back in March.
https://datazap.me/u/msh/log-1647110450?log=0&data=8-15-42
Now that doesn't mean it doesn't have a boost leak. If you're targeting say 25psi on a Vortex and the WG is closed the entire time you probably have a boost leak or a bad turbo.
You also have to look at the WG% to see how much duty it's taking to hit that boost level. In this case it's pretty high, but you guys are up in Denver and this is a lot of boost. Not surprising values.
In the latest log you will see that the WG is fully shut and it is also not hitting target boost (we assume, we can't see the PUT sensor actual).
https://datazap.me/u/msh/chasin-another-boost-leak?log=0&data=31-32-33
Now, this COULD be a boost leak, but also remember the ECU can only see that it has commanded the actuator shut and that the voltage applied should be forcing the flap to shut. If the internal spring to the actuator has grown tired and while it thinks the flap is shut it is physically unable to counteract the exhaust volume. But if that were the case you typically would see the WG% flapping around trying to modulate boost. I'm guessing since he said "another boost leak" and that this was pretty immediate happening that it probably is a boost leak. Or the turbo has finally had enough. Hoping for the former.