depends where it's rubbing. tread width matters in terms of evaluating contact patch but section width would matter if you're rubbing the sidewalls.
This.
If you're rubbing on the fuel filler neck, the section width will be the main problem. If you're hitting the fender liners at full lock, tread width will be your main issue.
Forgot to add but I measured the "mounted" overall section width on my V730s like I did on my RT660s many many posts ago. Here is how the overall widths are:
Tire | *TireRack* measured tread width (wheel mounted on) | *TireRack measured section width (wheel mounted on) | *MY* Measured overall section width (All on 17x9 Apex SM10) |
Falken RT660 245/40R17 | 8.5in/216mm (on 8.5in wheel) | 10.0in/254mm (on 8.5in wheel) | 259mm |
Kumho V730 245/40R17 | 8.7in/221mm (on 8.5in wheel) | 9.8in/249mm (on 8.5in wheel) | 256mm |
Kumho V730 255/40R17 | 8.9in/226mm (on 9in wheel) | 10.2in/259mm (on 9in wheel) | 261mm |
The RT660s have a MUCH more square profile as viewed from above vs the V730. The 245 RT660 on 17x9 Apex wheels I had just SLIGHT rubbing in the rear on the stock shock covers at stock ride height with -2.0 deg of camber. The 245 V730 is nowhere near making contact back there by comparison. Unfortunately all this proves is that the "tread width" measurement is kind of fuzzy as when the tire is rounded on the edges, it's hard to say exactly where it "ends". The photo below isn't *exactly* at the same angle, but they're real close. You can visually see the 245 RT660 appears noticeably beefier than the 245 V730.
The section width measurements I took are probably all within +/-1 or 2mm. Taken by placing the wheel on the concrete floor, using a carpenters level across the outside sidewall, and using a metric tape measure to the floor.
@Deanjet RS4s run wide, probably similar if not wider than the RT660 does for what it's worth. If knew someone local who had a set I'd try to measure for you.