Log view wise - based on the 2 logs I looked at Sneeky 1 and eqt 3rd gear 1 - at 5k they probably would feel close - but at 65-7000 those current logs the eqt should feel to pull a good bit harder as it’s doing higher boost and a lot more timing.Any noticeable difference, to your ass, between the two thus far?
I actually ordered the HPFP upgrade cause I figured “it’ll be enough for me…”Tough month.
learning from other peoples trial and error is generally cheaper than buying shit you dont need in the long run. read more, make informed decisions, you will go faster and have more money.I actually ordered the HPFP upgrade cause I figured “it’ll be enough for me…”
But I’m gonna try doing something I usually suck at, using advise from people so I called and canceled it today. Lol.
Any noticeable difference, to your ass, between the two thus far?
What's happening here? There hasn't been an update in three days, Jon. Do you notice a difference in drivability between the two tunes?
Maybe he’s just forgot that you did the sensor Upgrades and fueling, cause he only mentioned increasing timing towards being aggressive Vs adding boost.So a little disappointed with EQT. Nick is saying the tune looks finished, but to be fair is still willing to make any changes I want.
View attachment 232160
It's a little disappointing because the 'performance' of the tune wasn't changed since adding the LPFP and sensors. I was given the original revision 1.05 on 11/15. On 11/16, he gave me the updated revision 1.05 for the LPFP\sensors. Which were the only changes, there hasn't been any 'performance' increase to accommodate the additional parts put in. Considering he had it running fine on the last revision without the LPFP\sensors, what was the point of spending $1k and putting them in?
So a little disappointed with EQT. Nick is saying the tune looks finished, but to be fair is still willing to make any changes I want.
View attachment 232160
It's a little disappointing because the 'performance' of the tune wasn't changed since adding the LPFP and sensors. I was given the original revision 1.05 on 11/15. On 11/16, he gave me the updated revision 1.05 for the LPFP\sensors. Which were the only changes, there hasn't been any 'performance' increase to accommodate the additional parts put in. Considering he had it running fine on the last revision without the LPFP\sensors, what was the point of spending $1k and putting them in?
How much was boost increased?So a little disappointed with EQT. Nick is saying the tune looks finished, but to be fair is still willing to make any changes I want.
View attachment 232160
It's a little disappointing because the 'performance' of the tune wasn't changed since adding the LPFP and sensors. I was given the original revision 1.05 on 11/15. On 11/16, he gave me the updated revision 1.05 for the LPFP\sensors. Which were the only changes, there hasn't been any 'performance' increase to accommodate the additional parts put in. Considering he had it running fine on the last revision without the LPFP\sensors, what was the point of spending $1k and putting them in?
NoneHow much was boost increased?
How much was boost increased?
None
Maybe he’s just forgot that you did the sensor Upgrades and fueling, cause he only mentioned increasing timing towards being aggressive Vs adding boost.
If it makes you feel better the same thing happened to me. We wound it up to 31 psi and he said upgrade the LPFP because the rail pressure is dropping. Ok sounds reasonable.
Several hundred dollars later we ended up turning it back down anyway because “it was knocking”. A bummer for sure but the safer option. Weird they push the LPFP upgrade when the fuel quality is typically the limiting factor.
Pump gas is a bitch ain’t it