Many comlaints I see of cars are that they do not achieve the quoted MPG especially urban cycles and especially diesel owners
I suspect this is just maths. As we know, the testing process for getting the "manufacturer mpg" is entirely synthetic and done on a rolling road not in the real world. They don't even incorporate wind resistance as a result.
Is the disparity between testbed and real world MPG on diesels, in % terms, any larger than that seen on petrol cars? Our 1.4TSi is rated at 53.3 mpg on the mixed cycle, yet it turns in ~42-45 mpg pretty consistently. That's nearly 20% different. Apply that same margin to a diesel quoting 80 mpg and the real world number should be nearer 65 mpg. It only seems like a bigger difference..