Question, why does it need to when DSG's walk manuals all day long?
I completely understand manuals offer more engagement, but performance wise, there is no comparison.
Doesn't "need" to, I was pointing out that it can't.
The gearing in the DSG is built around this too, hence why there's two first gears pretty much(1st and 2nd) a 2nd 1/2 gear(3rd) a normal 4th, and two overdrives.
The Clubsport S doesn't use a DSG because of weight, and the gearing is better for a road course.
In sheer acceleration times, like 1/4 mile, the DSG is faster.
These are all things I've said before.
No where have I stated that one is better than the other. I point out some flaws of the DSG that basically is the flaws of ALL dual clutch manuals and people start getting all bent out of shape.
There is no such thing as the perfect setup, each side has it's benefits and disadvantages.
A sticky tire won't last as long
More boost creates more crank case pressure and heat
An aggressive clutch is harder to drive smoothly
There is no winning or losing.
Only preference, with benefits and disadvantages on each side. I am not coming up with what I said because I drove a DSG once and own a manual and try to justify my decision.
I have a DSG car and a 6MT car. Only option that makes a driving difference between the two cars is the DSG car has DCC the 6MT car does not. Both have the fender audio, a sunroof, leather, and the performance package.
Both at one point both were APR S1 HO with a TCU tune on the DSG car. If I was forced with the DSG car forever I'd live with it and run in manual mode all the time and bitch about the gearing past 80 MPH is way too fucking long.
I would be the extreme minority. I typically am when it comes to cars. It's ok. Doesn't mean I think people with DSGs are stupid/dumb/less than me.
It's plain not for me, and those were the reasons why.