Thanks a ton! Do you really think it needs more than PP brakes? I honestly don't from my understanding, other than a good set of pads and fluid, and stainless lines. It seems to me, most people who go BBK, mainly do it for cosmetics, not because they actually need it.
The brakes were great for me., they never faded and I was using them pretty heavy. I have some Porterfield R4-S pads in. The only problem I had on the track was that I boiled my fluid, likely because it was 15k miles / a year and a half old... but that's still a theory, we'll see how they do next track session. I think with just maybe some ventilation, good fluid, good pads, and possibly an upgraded rotor will be plenty for what I will do with the car. I wouldn't mind getting some bigger rear brakes if I can ever catch someone selling the PP/R rear brakes, which probably isn't going to happen because no one cares to get rid of those!
3:09s into your first YouTube video
https://youtu.be/2nIUGTPU0PY you say "My brakes are going dude" followed by your instructor saying "ok let's cools down" I'm breaking your balls but seems to conflict with your last statement
For reference I get zero fade ever, even after 20-30 minutes of track time, they actually get better as they heat up.
PP brakes are excellent stock brakes for dd and canyons.
However, I am 100% comfortable telling you if you plan to go to the track the PP brakes are woefully inadequate, they will fade very fast which ultimately results in an inconsistent feel and degraded stopping performance. When you get a little more experience you'll find the brakes limits within 2-3 laps. Right now I imagine you get 15 minutes before it feels muchy and ineffective.
Brakes are a science and I know extremely little about the science, but I have picked up a few higher level facts that will help you understand why the PP brakes are inadequate for track use.
1 - the rotors are small, this provides less surface area to distribute the heat across, heat is both what your try to make and trying to very quickly get rid of, this is so that the pads, rotors and fluid are not comprised by extreme temperatures.
2 - less surface area means you have to use smaller pads resulting in less pad to rotor friction
3 - the PP calipers are a floating, this means rather than force being applied to both sides of the the rotor, the caliper essentially uses a single large piston to push the pad against the static pad on the otherside of the rotor. This results in less distributed force as it's really being applied from one side, it also results in uneven pad wear.
4 - the more pistons you have does not mean the more pressure you can apply, but typically it means more pressure
distributed evenly over a larger surface, think grabbing the rotor with pliers vs grabbing a rotor with 3 sets of pliers. It is likely that in our specific case, more pressure is applied by a multi piston caliper vs the pp floating caliper.
5 - in a decent big brake kit the pistons are not the same size, there is a small, medium and large, this allows greater control of the brake force being applied.
6 - the PP 1 piece rotor design does not vent as efficiently as a bbk 2 piece design .
7 - Even though they are smaller the PP brakes are vastly heavier, this is unsprung weight.
8 - braided lines which come with bbks do not expand when the brake fluid rises to extreme temperatures, giving constant results.